[pedant hat on] Hang on a minute... something can't be 'new' and 'improved'. If it's new, it can't be improved upon since there was nothing in the first place to actually improve. If it's improved, there must have been something to improve upon, and therefore it can't be new.
If one was willing to take a purely chronological (rather than ontological, or indeed potentially epistemological) view of new then it can indeed be both new and improved.
Looks pretty good! Ours could do with a revamp too.... if only we knew a web developer....
ReplyDelete[pedant hat on] Hang on a minute... something can't be 'new' and 'improved'. If it's new, it can't be improved upon since there was nothing in the first place to actually improve. If it's improved, there must have been something to improve upon, and therefore it can't be new.
ReplyDeleteHow absolutely right.
ReplyDeleteHow very true
How wonderfully accurate
How sad.
If one was willing to take a purely chronological (rather than ontological, or indeed potentially epistemological) view of new then it can indeed be both new and improved.
ReplyDeleteWho are you, who are so wise in the ways of science?
ReplyDeleteSorry I don'r have time to answer that as I'm in the middle of working out a theory of the mass equilvalence of ducks & witches
ReplyDeleteAnd if she floats?
ReplyDeleteI believe the appropriate phrase will then be 'it's a fair cop'
ReplyDelete