Janice G. Raymond’s book, “Not a Choice, Not a Job: Exposing
the Myths About Prostitution and the Global Sex Trade”, describes a spectrum of
responses to prostitution, stretching from Stockholm
to Amsterdam .
At one end, the Dutch government has pioneered an approach which provides a
legal framework, within which the ‘sex-trade’ can operate openly. Their view is
that prostitution is inevitable and so should be normalised, giving the state some control over its’ worst elements.
Foundational to this approach is the claim that there is an objective and
observable difference between consensual contractual sex, and coercive,
exploitative prostitution. Those within the industry who support this view
describe themselves as ‘sex-workers’.
At the other end of the spectrum, the Swedish government has
adopted a model which criminalises the purchase of sex. Focussing their
attention on the demand, rather than supply of commercial sex; they
implicitly endorse the view that for vast numbers of women in prostitution,
this is not a ‘normal industry’ but a global economy of abuse. They argue that
there is no discernable dividing line between consensual sex-work and abusive
prostitution in the context where the vast majority of transactions involve
richer, more powerful men, paying pimps for their supposed right to buy the
bodies of poorer, more vulnerable, women. This view is often supported by
former prostitutes who reject the legitimizing language of ‘sex-work’, but call
themselves, ‘survivors’. They repeatedly state that acquiescence to abuse under
duress, or without other meaningful choices, does not constitute consent; and
that prostitution is therefore little more than financially compensated rape.
Raymond’s book is a detailed argument in favour of the
Swedish or ‘Nordic Model’, and against the normalisation of the purchase of
women for sex. Raymond writes from a feminist-abolitionist perspective, and her
book is a disturbing yet highly persuasive polemic, written with the tools of
the scholar, but the passion of an advocate. Drawing on UN-reports, NGO studies
and academic research, Raymond argues that legalisation and normalisation have
failed to deliver any of their supposed harm-reductions. Cities like Amsterdam , far from having
a decriminalised and controlled sex-industry, are in fact centres of crime,
abuse, people-trafficking and child sexual abuse. In contrast, Sweden’s
ten-year review of its policy saw significant reductions in abuse, high numbers
of survivors escaping the trade, and 70% public approval of their approach; she
asserts.
Underlying Raymond’s approach is her view that all prostitution
is damaging and exploitative. Therefore, attempts to reduce-harm are doomed to
failure, and primarily serve to protect the profits of pimps and traffickers.
Prostitution and trafficking are on the political agenda across Europe . Raymond claims that the Dutch perspective is
being promoted by governments, those who profit from commercial sex, and the
media. In contrast, the merits of the Nordic model are not being heard across
the Continent, despite some smaller parliaments (such as Northern Ireland )
recently adopting this approach.
In seeking to understand the humanity and social benefits of
the Nordic model, “Not a Choice, Not a Job: Exposing the Myths About
Prostitution and the Global Sex Trade”, is the place to start.
________
First published in Solas Magazine, reproduced with permission (www.solas-cpc.org)
No comments:
Post a Comment